Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Post #5 2/24/09 Your John Hancock, Please

2/24/09

So, I was reading the latest issue of Newsweek the other day and I came across an interesting article: “The Curse of Cursive”. It discussed the quickly fading art of…you guessed it: penmanship. In an age dominated by IM, MySpace, E-mail, blogging, and whatever else you can think of, the good old-fashioned technique of getting your point across is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. Unfortunate for some. A godsend for others.

Me? I’m split right down the middle. See, I remember when I was learning to write. Those long hours spent at my little plastic-top table in kindergarten copying each letter of the alphabet onto my piece of manuscript paper (Remember those? Exactly. That’s how old we are.) over and over and over until the letters were so engrained in my head that I’d continue on past the paper and write on the desk, much to the dismay of my teacher. Yup, I remember those days. Pure and utter torture. Because while all my other friends were diligently perfecting to dot their i’s and cross their t’s, I gave up somewhere along the way. The heck with it, I thought. My handwriting doesn’t need practice. Not when there are more important things like math I need to figure out. Little did I know that for the rest of my school years, heck, for the rest of my life, practicing was exactly what I’d be doing.

But then I discovered that I had a talent: writing. Kind of ironic, don’t you think? It was third grade. Looking back at it now, years later, it was one of the most atrocious things I’d ever created. But for a third grader, I’d say it was pretty darn good. And so it began. Since computers were not something every other family had then, I was stuck hand writing each and every page, my small hand flying across the paper. My first project in third grade was short, nothing elaborate really although I did go through the trouble of editing it with a red pen the way I was taught by my teachers. The plot was ill-conceived, the spelling horrendous but I got my point across, beginning, middle, and end. I still have the original papers and after taking a peek at them the other day, I noticed a funny thing: my handwriting is almost exactly the same. True, I had a lot more space between letters the way that many kids do when they’re still getting the hang of this strange concept and my y’s were a bit different but other than that, it was a carbon copy. Anyway, I kept up this new found hobby, hand writing each poem and short story that I came up with. And in sixth grade I actually completed my first full-length story. It filled two 70 page notebooks and was no where near brilliant but I hand wrote it. All of it. So that was an accomplishment. The following year, I completed yet another project. This time, it filled a 2-inch binder including pre-write, research, and other information I had regarding the subject. But the age of the computer was fast approaching and as life began to demand more and more essays, reports, and theses, I, along with the rest of the world, gradually got sucked into the vortex of the cyber world.

Which brings us back to my original point: the issue of handwriting’s diminishing importance. Having struggled all my life to make my messy scrawl at least somewhat legible, a part of me wouldn’t be all that depressed if it did just fall off the face of the earth. And yet, the other part of me, the part that spent hours and hours toiling away, furiously scribbling all of my various projects throughout the years, would be absolutely devastated if handwriting was no longer part of our world. Because then what would happen to that individuality that came with everyone’s distinct script? That includes your signature. All of that. Gone. If handwriting disappears from modern society, a small part of what makes us who we are, what makes us human is erased. Furthermore, studies have shown that “handwriting fluency is a fundamental building block of learning”. Without it, I guess you could say that we’d be missing a window or a 2×4 in the metaphorical house of learning.

So the next time you open your computer to send your distant cousin in Weehawken an e-mail or to type up that 50 page report on global interdependence due tomorrow, take a moment to think about your handwriting and the long, agonizing journey you embarked on to achieve a script that is at least somewhat decipherable. You’ll either feel accomplished.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Post #4 2/17/09 To Trek or Not to Trek?

2/17/09
Ok, who’s excited to see the new Star Trek movie in May? I know I am. I’m no Trekkie but I can’t help but feel the air of anticipation along with avid Star Trek fans. It’s a bit like…the Harry Potter movies. It doesn’t really matter if you’ve read the books or not; you’re going to end up watching the movie at one point or another. Now, apart from it being the one and only Star Trek, I have my own reasons to be excited for this movie.

Number 1: It’s directed by the amazing J.J. Abrams, co-creator of what has to be one of the greatest tv shows of all time, Lost. I’ve been a fan of that show ever since I saw it’s fourth episode, “Walkabout”, back in 2004 while I was bored one weekend so naturally, anything that has to do with it gets an automatic A in my book.


Number 2: It’s score is composed by Michael Giacchino, who also composes the music for Lost. I know that may not mean anything to most people but musical score is one of the things I value in a movie or tv show. I just love the way a good composer can get the emotion of a scene to come across in the music. Trying listening to the scores of Pirates of the Caribbean or The Lord of the Rings if you don’t get what I mean. Furthermore, I’m pretty sure we’ve all heard the Star Trek theme at one point or another in our lives, although we may not remember it too clearly and while the composer may be different from the original series’, Giacchino has said that “he would retain at least the original theme…by Alexander Courage”.


Number 3: It has a few of my favorite actors in it. First, Jennifer Morrison who will play James Kirk’s mother, Winona. On another one of my favorite tv shows, House, she plays Dr. Allison Cameron. Funny stuff, that show. But if you find yourself appalled by extremely rude people I suggest that you stay clear of it since the main character has a bit of a prickly and at times abrasive disposition. Second, Eric Bana playing Romulan villan, Nero.



Bit of a scary character, isn’t he? I don’t know about you but I wouldn’t want to get on his bad side. You probably won’t recognize Bana as Nero but he played Bruce Banner in The Hulk (the first one, not the second one). Third, Karl Urban as Dr. Leonard McCoy. Now, unless you’re a movie junkie like I am, you probably wouldn’t have the slightest clue as to who he is. He’s been in a bunch of movies though that I’m sure you’ve at least heard of, if not seen. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, and The Bourne Supremacy to name a few.


Great reasons, huh? And the best part is that they basically have nothing to do with the plot so if the movie went to pieces in the eyes of Trekkies, I wouldn’t know the difference since I have nothing to compare it to, having seen only one episode of TNG. Fantastic don’t you think? And now, the long wait for May 8, 2009. Bring it on, Abrams. Bring it on.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Post #3 2/10/09 Redemption: Reloaded

2/9/09


I know we've been hearing a lot about The Crucible and what not so I decided to talk about something that is tangentially related to the book. Actually, it's directly related to the book but not in the way you might think.


So, I bombed that timed write the other day. Considering that my grade will now drop precipitously because of it, I thought I'd better redeem myself by writing something that reflects that I at least appear to know what the heck I'm talking about when it comes to that wonderful theme of redemption. Because if you read my timed write, you'd think that...well, actually I don't know what you'd think but I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be handing me a Nobel Peace Prize for literature for it.

Anyways, I've been reading this book called Sarah's Key by Tatiana de Rosnay. And guess what? One of the themes is redemption. Convienient right? I sure thought so. It's about the Vel' d'Hiv' roundup in Paris, France, one of France's most notorious colaborations with Nazi Germany during World War II. On July 16, 1942, thousands of Jewish men, women, and children were arrested by the French police at the break of dawn and escorted to the Velodrome d'Hiver, a famous stadium that was host to countless bike races. There they waited in atrocious conditions until they were herded onto trains headed for camps in the French countryside. For many, that was to be their last glimpse of their country before men were separated from their families and women from their children, and once again forced onto trains this time headed for the dreaded concentration camp, Auschwitch-Birkenau.

At the center of all this is ten-year-old Sirka "Sarah" Starzynski, the daughter of Jewish immigrants living a simple life in Paris. Through her eyes, we see the events of Vel' d'Hiv unfold as she is striped of the life she knew. She is separated from her father and mother and everything she holds dear. But the most devastating fact of all, her four-year-old brother, Michel, who she locked in their secret hidding spot when the French police came to arrest the family on that unforgettable day with every intention of coming back to get him, is now alone in their Parisian apartment and time is running out.


Sixty years later, Julia Jarmond, an American journalist living with her French husband and eleven-year-old daughter in Paris, is assigned to write an article commemorating Vel' d'Hiv's 60th anniversary. As she investigates one of the darkest moments in French history, she soon discovers a family secret that connects her with Sarah. As we go back and forth between Sarah's point-of-view and Julia's, the pieces slowly come together and their interconnected lives gradually begin to take shape.

Now, I haven't finished it yet but I've gotten far enough that I know what that family secret is. If you want to know what it is, highlight the following area. But in the instance that you feel like reading the book and don't want to be spoiled, just skip ahead.



After the roundup, land lords and conceirges of the apartments formerly occupied by Jews scramble in a mad dash to find new occupants for the deserted flats, not at all concerned about the fates of the Jewish families that had been taken. As it turns out, Julia's father-in-law Edouard, with whom she's always had somewhat of a strained relationship, had moved into Sarah's old apartment with his family as a 12-year-old, with not even the slightest knowledge of the family that used to live there before him. That is, until young Sarah shows up at his door one day. She had escaped the French camp near Orleans and had now returned to get her brother. Unfortunately for Sarah, Edouard, and Andre, Edouard's father, a horrific discovery awaits them when she opens the secret compartment: the tiny body of a blond, four-year-old boy.


Sarah is devasted. Edouard is speechless. And Andre is guilt-ridden. Sarah leaves the apartment, vowing never to come back, leaving Andre to blame himself for the terrible fate of little Michel. He then makes Edouard swear to never tell anyone, especially his mother, of what had happened, knowing that the truth would be the family's shame. In the years that followed, Edouard kept his promise but grew to resent his father for not even attempting to reach out to Sarah. Now, with Julia delving deep into the past, the truth about what happened to Sarah is brought into the light. Contrary to what Edouard believed about his father's apathy, Andre had actually sent a large sum of money every year for ten years to the family that had taken Sarah in. He had sent letters, asking after her health, her life, her happiness, wanting to know if she was safe, if she was alright. Despite not really knowing her, he cared for her as best could given the circumstances. It was the least he could do for a girl who had lost everything to the horrors of war. He wasn't looking for her forgiveness, knowing that no amount of money could ever earn it. But he wanted to know that if there was one decent thing he did in his life, it was that he had helped that traumatized little girl that had shown up at his doorstep to live a somewhat decent life.

It really is a great story. I highly recommend it if you just so happen to have some spare time on your hands. As Naomi Ragen, author of The Saturday Wife and The Covenant said of it, “This is a remarkable historical novel, a book which brings to light a disturbing and deliberately hidden aspect of French behavior towards Jews during World War II. Like Sophie's Choice, it's a book that impresses itself upon one's heart and soul forever."


For more information and reviews on the book visit:

http://www.amazon.com/Sarahs-Key-Tatiana-Rosnay/dp/0312370830

Friday, February 6, 2009

Post #2 2/2/09 Acting. It's What We Do.

2/2/09

As Oscar Wilde once said, “I love acting. It is so much more real than life.”

I couldn’t agree more, Mr. Wilde. Because what is life, if not a façade that we’ve cared for and nurtured since the beginning of our very existence? Every single day, whether we’re aware of it or not, we act. We act like we know what the heck our friend is rambling on about when, in reality, they lost us the moment they opened their mouth. We act like we don’t care that the barista handed us a caffe macchiato instead of a mocha cappuccino for the second day in a row. We act because as humans, that’s exactly what we’re programmed to do.

Never mind Johnny or Brad or Julia or any other celebrity for that matter. They’ve just taken acting and gone pro. I’m talking about the regular, day to day performances that we put on whether it’s simply for ourselves or a wider audience. We act because we all got something to hide. It may not be the most interesting or scandalous of things but granted, it’s there. The question is: how well do we hide them? Like celebrities, there is a vast spectrum of categories we can fit into from the A-listers to the D-listers. The A-listers are impeccable. On the outside, their façade is flawless. They could be through an emotional nuclear war and we would suspect nothing about them. The D-listers, on the other hand, are…well, let’s face it, not everyone can be a star.

Now, personally, I see a direct link between acting and lying. When you act, you lie about who you really are. When you lie, you act like something you’re really not. So in a sense, we’re all guilty of being liars, just not necessarily to the extreme that we normally associate the word. So lie to me all you want because chances are, I’m lying to you. About what, that’s for me to know and for you to, hopefully, never find out.

Does that then mean that there isn’t any truth in anything that we do? Is our facade limited to simply being smoke in mirrors? Not necessarily. Because we may also act (or lie) if it serves a greater purpose and does not just benefit ourselves. Our motives may be to strive to work toward the virtue of truth though even if the means to achieve this are less virtuous. The ability to do this, however, is debateable as discussed in “Lying and Ethics” an article by Tim. C Mazur, since “the ideal person we continuously strive to be, cannot achieve one virtue without achieving them all.”

Post #1 1/27/09 17th Century Capital Punishment

1/27/09

During the 17th century, there were several execution methods being employed at the time. However, according to About Punishments for Witches in Salem, an online article, “Hanging was a common form of capital punishment in the 17th century, both in America and abroad.” This particular method has been popularized in our modern world through the use of film, literature, art, and other forms of media. There even exists a common word game by the same name. However, this early form of capital punishment was by no means an enjoyable experience. Aside from the well-known breaking of the neck, which may or may not kill the victim, hanging may also induce several symptoms before the death including closure of the carotid arteries (resulting in a loss of blood flow to the brain), closure of the jugular veins, and induction of carotid reflex (resulting in terminal cardiac arrest) (taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging).

For more information, please refer to the following sites: http://www.ehow.com/about_4570612_punishments-witches-salem.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging